In a surprising move during a period marked by economic instability, the Trump administration took a controversial action that could deepen uncertainty. Last week, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick announced the dissolution of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee (FESAC). While the closure of an advisory committee may seem minor to some, its impact on crucial economic data collection is significant and far-reaching.

The Role of FESAC

FESAC was instrumental in enhancing the quality of economic indicators used by both government entities and private businesses. The committee’s main objective was to ensure that economic data remains timely, accurate, and relevant to the evolving demands of the market. This ongoing initiative is critical in a complex economy like that of the United States, where accurate data informs a variety of decisions affecting daily life.

Expertise and Contributions

The committee was composed of 15 unpaid experts from various sectors, including academia and the non-profit realm. Their insights were vital for agencies like the Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Bureau of Economic Analysis, which rely on high-quality statistics to shape national economic policy. The discontinuation of FESAC raises concerns about the reliability of data, especially as the economy continues to evolve rapidly.

• Meeting Focus: In its last meeting in December, the committee explored ways to measure the rising influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the economy.
• AI Adoption: Recent findings reveal that AI utilization among businesses has almost doubled since late 2023, with many organizations planning to incorporate AI technologies in the coming months.

The Need for Accurate Data

As economic conditions shift, the need for precise and current data becomes even more pressing. The committee played a crucial role in gathering expert opinions on what specific data products would be most beneficial, particularly regarding the standardization of AI definitions across various surveys. The implications of AI on employment and growth represent some of the most urgent questions for economic stakeholders today.

Insights from the Private Sector

During discussions, members highlighted the potential of utilizing private-sector data to develop more effective statistics. Many businesses and local governments have expressed a strong need for timely regional data, which current government surveys often fail to provide due to budget constraints. Experts from companies like Indeed and JP Morgan Chase offered valuable perspectives on integrating private data sources.

Importance of External Review

The National Academies of Sciences have emphasized the importance of external advisory committees like FESAC in maintaining high standards for statistical agencies. These committees offer a platform for data users to share feedback and ensure that government statistics remain relevant and effective. With budget cuts looming, the elimination of FESAC undermines the potential for constructive external evaluation.

Implications of Disbanding FESAC

The decision to disband FESAC is not aligned with the administration’s purported goals for government efficiency. The committee’s operational costs were estimated at a mere $120,000 for 2024, a small price for the value it provided. Transitioning to virtual meetings could have further minimized expenses, yet the benefits of ongoing expert engagement far outweighed these costs.

• Lack of Transparency: The absence of external oversight heightens the risk of political influence on economic data, a concern particularly relevant given the administration’s previous critiques of employment statistics.
• Broader Implications: This move is part of a larger trend, as the administration is also dissolving multiple advisory committees across federal agencies, potentially jeopardizing the quality and transparency of essential government services.

In conclusion, the dissolution of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee could have far-reaching implications for the reliability of economic data in the U.S. As the need for accurate information grows ever more critical, the administration’s decision to reduce external advisory resources raises alarms about the future of economic transparency and integrity.

Want More Insights?

Stay updated with the latest economic news and analysis by subscribing to our newsletter.

Claudia Sahm, an economist at New Century Advisors and former Federal Reserve economist, has voiced her concerns regarding this significant shift in economic policy and its potential repercussions.