• Home
  • Corporate
  • Honasa Consumer Takes Legal Action Against HUL Over Controversial Lakme Ad: Mamaearth’s Bold Move
Honasa Consumer Takes Legal Action Against HUL Over Controversial Lakme Ad: Mamaearth's Bold Move

Honasa Consumer Takes Legal Action Against HUL Over Controversial Lakme Ad: Mamaearth’s Bold Move

Honasa Consumer Takes Legal Action Against Hindustan Unilever Over Sunscreen Ad

Honasa Consumer Ltd, the company behind the popular skincare brand Mamaearth, has initiated a legal battle against Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL). The lawsuit, recently filed in the Delhi High Court, centers on allegations that HUL’s advertisement for Lakme Sun Expert sunscreen is both misleading and disparaging towards competitors.

Allegations of Misleading Advertising

In its complaint, Honasa Consumer asserts that the Lakme campaign titled “SPF Lie Detector Test” unfairly targets rival products, particularly a sunscreen that bears a striking resemblance to one offered by The Derma Co., another brand owned by Honasa. The lawsuit claims that the advertisement undermines the credibility of these competing brands without valid justification.

  • Key Points of the Lawsuit:
    • Honasa Consumer demands the removal of the Lakme advertisement.
    • The Delhi High Court has requested HUL to respond to these allegations.
    • The court observed that the ad appears to be disparaging “on the face of it.”

Upcoming Court Proceedings

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the next hearing for April 17, where both Honasa and HUL will present their arguments regarding the contentious advertisement.

Contentions in the Lakme Campaign

The controversy stems from a recent Lakme advertisement promoting its Sun Expert SPF 50 sunscreen. The ad suggests that many emerging digital-first sunscreen brands misrepresent their SPF protection, claiming to provide SPF 50 when, in reality, they may only offer as little as SPF 20. Lakme’s defense hinges on its use of in-vivo testing—considered a global benchmark for assessing sunscreen efficacy—as a means to substantiate its claims.

See also  Law Ministry Orders Ahmedabad Court to Serve US SEC Summons to Gautam Adani in Bribery Case: Latest Update

This legal dispute highlights the intense competition in the skincare market, particularly among brands that emphasize transparency and accuracy in their product claims. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly attract significant attention from both the industry and consumers.

Stay tuned for further updates as this case progresses, particularly the outcome of the upcoming court hearing.

For more insights on the latest developments in the skincare industry, check out our articles on sunscreen effectiveness and advertising regulations in cosmetics.

Related Post

PhonePe Goes Public: What You Need to Know About Its Upcoming IPO
PhonePe Goes Public: What You Need to Know About Its Upcoming IPO
ByAbhinandanApr 19, 2025

Walmart-backed PhonePe has transitioned from a private to a public entity, gearing up for an…

Government Revamps Domestic Gas Allocation Policy for CNG and PNG Sectors
Government Revamps Domestic Gas Allocation Policy for CNG and PNG Sectors
ByAbhinandanApr 18, 2025

The Indian Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas announced updates to the gas allocation framework…

US Declares India's WTO Challenge on Aluminium and Steel Tariffs Unviable
US Declares India’s WTO Challenge on Aluminium and Steel Tariffs Unviable
ByAbhinandanApr 18, 2025

The U.S. is open to discussing additional tariffs on steel and aluminum with India but…

Stranded and Frustrated: BluSmart Drivers Left in the Lurch After Sudden Shutdown
Stranded and Frustrated: BluSmart Drivers Left in the Lurch After Sudden Shutdown
ByAbhinandanApr 18, 2025

Over 10,000 driver-partners of BluSmart are left jobless and confused after the company abruptly ceased…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JOIN US

Get Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to get the best stories into your inbox!